Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage
Parents in Jersey are rightfully alarmed by the Children, Young People, Education and Skills Department’s ‘Trans Inclusion Guidance,’ which undermines parental authority by stating that schools are not obligated to inform parents if their child begins ‘changing gender’ at school. This policy reflects a troubling trend of prioritizing ideological agendas over family unity and child welfare. Parents, who bear the primary responsibility for their children’s upbringing, are being sidelined as schools adopt secretive policies that could have profound, irreversible effects on young minds still navigating their identity.
The guidance’s directive to allow children to use facilities like toilets and changing rooms aligned with their self-identified gender, rather than biological reality, raises serious concerns. Jersey-based solicitor and father Michael Shenkin aptly noted that children lack the maturity to make such life-altering decisions. Encouraging impressionable youths to believe they are “born in the wrong body” without parental input risks misdiagnosing deeper emotional or psychological issues. This approach dismisses the wisdom of parents, who are best positioned to guide their children through complex personal struggles.
Equally disturbing is the guidance’s suggestion that schools may conceal a child’s alternate name or pronouns from parents, fostering a wedge between families. An anonymous parent called this “extraordinary,” and rightly so—schools should not be colluding to keep secrets from those legally and morally responsible for a child’s well-being. The Christian Institute’s Head of Education, John Denning, emphasized that safeguarding children, not advancing fashionable political causes, should be the priority. The guidance’s reliance on contested ideologies, rather than biological and psychological truths, puts vulnerable children at risk of harm.
The Cass Review, a landmark report, underscores the gravity of social transition in schools, describing it as a significant psychological step that demands caution. It warns against schools creating divisions between children and parents and highlights the need for specialist clinical advice before any transition, especially pre-puberty. Yet Jersey’s guidance recklessly empowers teachers—unqualified to make such decisions—to facilitate social transitions, including access to opposite-sex facilities. This could expose girls to risks, as teenage boys claiming a female identity may access their changing rooms, defying recent UK Supreme Court rulings and Equality and Human Rights Commission advice.
The UK’s recent rollback of similar Stonewall-influenced guidance in England’s ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ offers a hopeful precedent. The 2024 revisions removed claims that being LGBT inherently poses no risk, replacing them with a cautious approach informed by the Cass Review. Jersey should follow suit, prioritizing child safety and parental rights over ideological conformity. Schools must foster trust with families, not secrecy, ensuring that policies protect children’s well-being while respecting the foundational role of parents in their lives.